We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 06 September 24
REBOUND IN OIL DEMAND COULD LIFT MARKET IN LATTER HALF OF 2024 - BIMCO
Supply/demand
Based on a strong second half demand, the supply/balance is forecast to strengthen in 2024 but weaken slightly in 2025 as n ...
Friday, 06 September 24
GLOBAL SEABORNE LNG TRADE HAS CONTINUED TO INCREASE LAST YEAR - BANCHERO COSTA
Global seaborne LNG trade has continued to increase last year, helped also by the events in Ukraine which forced Europe to diversify away from Russ ...
Wednesday, 28 August 24
SEABORNE COAL IMPORTS INTO INDIA INCREASED BY +9.9% Y-O-Y TO 146.6 MLN T - BANCHERO COSTA
Global coal trade has really picked up pace over the past year, and is now fully back to pre-Covid levels said Banchero Costa Research in its lates ...
Tuesday, 06 August 24
EXERCISE CAUTION WITH AMMONIA SWITCH - BALTIC EXCHANGE
A new study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has thrown a spanner into the plan to transition ships from diesel fuel to ammonia ...
Friday, 02 August 24
ENERGY MARKET DEVELOPMENTS: COAL AND NATURAL GAS PRICES REACH RECORD HIGHS - WORLD BANK
The recent surge in natural gas and coal prices has been so swift that the main benchmarks were roughly three times higher in 2022Q2 compared to a ...
|
|
|
Showing 1 to 5 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
|
| |
| |
|
1 